homestudy quiz

what's your study character?

Eight quick questions about how you actually study. You get one of six characters, your colour, and three study techniques with real research behind them.

ready?

8 questions, about a minute. Pick the answer that sounds most like you, not the one you wish was true. Nothing is saved or sent anywhere.

study character

the sprinter

All gas, right before the deadline.

your colour: coral

the habit

You save most of your studying for the last few days, then go all in. It feels productive and you usually get through, but a week later most of it is gone.

your superpower

You can focus hard when it counts.

the personality link

lower conscientiousness

Putting things off is most closely tied to conscientiousness, especially its self-control and organization sides, and to impulsiveness. It's a pattern, not a character flaw, and the techniques below are built to work around it (Steel, 2007).

what the research says

Cramming works for tomorrow and fades fast. In one flashcard study, spacing beat cramming for 90% of students, yet 72% thought cramming had worked better (Kornell, 2009). Lower performers are also more likely to study late at night and to be driven by deadlines (Hartwig & Dunlosky, 2012).

try these three.

spread the same hours out

how: Take the hours you'd cram and split them into short sessions across two weeks. Come back to each topic after a day, then again after a week.

why it works: Spacing beats cramming across hundreds of experiments, and the best gap gets longer the further away your exam is (Cepeda et al., 2006; Kornell, 2009).
recall it, then relearn it

how: In your first session, quiz yourself until you get each concept right 3 times. Then come back on 3 more days and get each one right once.

why it works: This schedule, called successive relearning, gave strong memory months later for very little extra practice time (Rawson & Dunlosky, 2011).
make if-then plans

how: Decide the when and where ahead of time: 'If it's Tuesday after my 2:30 lab, then I do 30 minutes of chem flashcards in the library.'

why it works: If-then plans had a medium-to-large effect on reaching goals across 94 tests (Gollwitzer & Sheeran, 2006).

Sleep counts too. In one chemistry class, students' sleep over the month before a test tracked with their grades, while sleep on the single night before did not (Okano et al., 2019).

see all six

study character

the scribe

The prettiest notes in the lecture hall.

your colour: sunny yellow

the habit

Your notes are beautiful and you reread them a lot. The page feels familiar, so you feel ready, until the exam asks you to pull it from memory.

your superpower

You're organized, and your notes make a great question bank.

the personality link

high conscientiousness

Organized, careful and hard-working is high conscientiousness, the Big Five trait with the clearest link to good grades. The catch is that effort pays off most when it goes into the right technique (Poropat, 2009).

what the research says

That familiar feeling can fool you: how easy something feels while reading is a poor guide to what you'll remember (Bjork et al., 2013). In one survey, 84% of students reread their notes, but only 11% tested themselves (Karpicke et al., 2009). Rereading and highlighting were rated low utility. Practice testing was rated high (Dunlosky et al., 2013).

try these three.

close the notes and blurt

how: Write everything you remember about a topic on a blank page. Then open your notes and fill the gaps in a different colour.

why it works: Students who tested themselves remembered more a week later than students who restudied, even though restudying made them feel more confident. Recalling from scratch works better than recognizing (Roediger & Karpicke, 2006; Rowland, 2014).
turn notes into questions

how: Rewrite each heading as a question and answer it before you look. Flashcards count, as long as you answer before you flip.

why it works: Practice testing beat restudying across a large meta-analysis of lab and classroom studies (Adesope et al., 2017; Dunlosky et al., 2013).
check yourself a day later

how: Before you mark a topic as done, wait a day and answer its questions cold. If you can't, it isn't done yet.

why it works: Judging what you know right after reading tends to overestimate it. A delayed check is more honest (Bjork et al., 2013).

You don't have to give up rereading. It's linked to better grades too, it just shouldn't be the whole plan (Hartwig & Dunlosky, 2012).

see all six

study character

the overthinker

Studied for days. Still sure it'll go wrong.

your colour: lilac

the habit

You put in the work, but the worry follows you into the exam. Sometimes your mind goes blank on things you knew the night before.

your superpower

You care, and you usually start early.

the personality link

higher neuroticism

Test anxiety is largely explained by neuroticism, the Big Five trait for how strongly you feel worry and stress. Feeling it more doesn't mean you can't do well. It means the tools below matter more for you (Chamorro-Premuzic et al., 2008).

what the research says

Test anxiety is linked to lower scores, from university entrance exams to GPA, across 238 studies (von der Embse et al., 2018). The good news: how you study and how you read your nerves can both change that (Smith et al., 2016; Brady et al., 2018).

try these three.

practise like it's the real thing

how: Do past exams or question sets closed-book and timed, so test day feels like something you've already done.

why it works: In the lab, memories built with practice tests held up under stress while restudied ones didn't. In one school program, 72% of students said regular quizzing made them less nervous for exams (Smith et al., 2016; Agarwal et al., 2014).
write the worry down

how: Right before the exam, take a few minutes to write out exactly what you're worried about.

why it works: A short writing exercise just before an exam boosted scores, especially for students who usually get test anxiety (Ramirez & Beilock, 2011).
reframe the butterflies

how: When your heart starts racing, tell yourself: this is my body getting ready, and it helps me focus.

why it works: Students taught to see stress as helpful reported less anxiety and scored higher on real exams (Jamieson et al., 2016; Brady et al., 2018).

If worry is getting in the way of everyday life and not just exams, your campus counselling service is a good next step.

see all six

study character

the daydreamer

One quick check... forty minutes ago.

your colour: sky blue

the habit

You sit down to study, then a notification, a new tab or a random thought pulls you away. Hours go by and the progress doesn't match.

your superpower

Curious, creative and full of ideas.

the personality link

impulsivity and sensation seeking

People who multitask the most tend to be more impulsive and more drawn to new, exciting things. They also tend to overestimate how good they are at multitasking (Sanbonmatsu et al., 2013).

what the research says

Split attention costs more than it seems. When devices were allowed in lectures, students scored about half a letter grade lower on the final exam, even though they did fine on the quizzes in class (Glass & Kang, 2019). Laptop multitasking also hurt the students sitting nearby (Sana et al., 2013).

try these three.

phone in another room

how: Before you start, put your phone on silent in another room or in your bag, and close every tab you don't need.

why it works: Divided attention lowered exam scores weeks later, not just in the moment (Glass & Kang, 2019; Sana et al., 2013).
study in blocks with set breaks

how: Try 24 minutes of work and a 6-minute break, on a timer. Take the break when the timer rings, not when your mind wanders.

why it works: Students who took fixed breaks felt less tired and distracted, and got the same work done in less time, than students who took breaks whenever they felt like it (Biwer et al., 2023).
one target per block, on paper

how: Before each block, write down one small target, like 'finish 10 orgo questions', and tick it off when you're done.

why it works: Monitoring your progress helps you reach your goals, especially when you physically write it down (Harkin et al., 2016).

If-then plans help here too: 'If I want to check my phone, then I finish the question I'm on first.' They help shield your work from distractions (Gollwitzer & Sheeran, 2006).

see all six

study character

the perfectionist

Will start as soon as the plan is perfect.

your colour: bubblegum pink

the habit

You hold yourself to a high standard. You rewrite notes, redo the plan or wait for the right moment, so starting and moving on are the hard parts.

your superpower

Careful and thorough, and you care about quality.

the personality link

perfectionism

Perfectionism is a personality trait with two sides: striving for high standards, and worrying about making mistakes. It's the worry side that makes starting hard (Sirois et al., 2017).

what the research says

High standards aren't the problem. Worrying about mistakes is linked to more procrastination, while striving for excellence is linked to less (Sirois et al., 2017). The tasks that feel most unpleasant are the ones we put off the most (Steel, 2007).

try these three.

shrink the first step

how: Plan a start so small it can't go wrong: 'If I sit down at my desk, then I do 3 practice questions.' Once you've started, keep going.

why it works: If-then plans help people get started on goals. And since the tasks that feel worst get delayed the most, an easy first step takes away the dread (Gollwitzer & Sheeran, 2006; Steel, 2007).
mix topics, mistakes included

how: Instead of perfecting chapter 1 before touching chapter 2, mix practice problems from a few chapters. Getting some wrong is part of the process.

why it works: Mixing problem types beat practising one type at a time, especially when the topics look alike. Practice that feels harder often sticks better (Brunmair & Richter, 2019; Rohrer & Taylor, 2007; Bjork et al., 2013).
forgive the slip

how: Missed a study day? Name it, forgive yourself, and pick the next small step. Skip the guilt spiral.

why it works: Students who forgave themselves for procrastinating before one midterm procrastinated less before the next one (Wohl et al., 2010).

see all six

study character

the explainer

Can't remember it until I know why.

your colour: mint

the habit

You need to understand how things work, and you love talking it through. Sometimes you get the big idea but blank on the details the exam asks for.

your superpower

You go deep, and you can help others get it.

the personality link

high openness

Wanting to know how and why things work goes with openness to experience, the Big Five trait most linked to a deep approach to learning (Chamorro-Premuzic & Furnham, 2009).

what the research says

Explaining is a real strength: getting students to explain material to themselves improved learning across 64 studies (Bisra et al., 2018). But understanding isn't the same as recall. Practice testing beat concept mapping, even on tests of understanding (Karpicke & Blunt, 2011).

try these three.

ask why at every step

how: As you read, stop after each idea and explain why it's true or how it connects to something you already know.

why it works: Self-explaining improved learning across 64 studies, and a big review of study techniques rated it moderate utility, a step below testing and spacing (Bisra et al., 2018; Dunlosky et al., 2013).
teach it without notes

how: Explain the topic to a friend, your phone camera or your wall, from memory. Then check what you missed.

why it works: Teaching from memory helped a week later. Teaching with notes in front of you didn't, which suggests the recall is what does the work (Koh et al., 2018; Fiorella & Mayer, 2013).
finish with mixed questions

how: End every session with practice questions from different topics, so you have to pull out the details and choose the right approach.

why it works: Retrieval builds the detailed memory that understanding alone doesn't, and mixing problem types helps you pick the right method on the exam (Karpicke & Blunt, 2011; Rohrer & Taylor, 2007).

see all six

two moves for every character

Whatever you got, start with these two. A big review of ten popular study techniques rated only these two high utility, because they helped learners of different ages and abilities, across lots of subjects and kinds of tests (Dunlosky et al., 2013).

test yourself

Flashcards, practice questions, blank-page recall. Anything that makes you pull the answer out of your head (Dunlosky et al., 2013; Adesope et al., 2017).

space it out

Short sessions spread over days and weeks beat one long session, for the same total time (Dunlosky et al., 2013; Cepeda et al., 2006).

meet all six

Most people are a mix. Tap any character to see their habit, the research and their three techniques.

the sprinter All gas, right before the deadline. see the techniques
the scribe The prettiest notes in the lecture hall. see the techniques
the overthinker Studied for days. Still sure it'll go wrong. see the techniques
the daydreamer One quick check... forty minutes ago. see the techniques
the perfectionist Will start as soon as the plan is perfect. see the techniques
the explainer Can't remember it until I know why. see the techniques

is this a personality test?

Not quite, and that's on purpose. The popular idea that you learn best when teaching matches your "learning style" has almost no good evidence behind it (Pashler et al., 2008). The techniques that work best, like testing yourself and spacing your study out, help pretty much everyone (Dunlosky et al., 2013).

What personality does change is what gets in your way. That's why every character comes with a personality link: procrastination goes with lower conscientiousness (Steel, 2007), test anxiety with neuroticism (Chamorro-Premuzic et al., 2008), and a deep, why-first approach to learning with openness (Chamorro-Premuzic & Furnham, 2009). Conscientiousness also predicts grades overall (Poropat, 2009). Some of the clearer predictors of university GPA are about how you work, though, like effort regulation, which means sticking with work when it gets boring or hard (Richardson et al., 2012). How you work can change, so the quiz asks about your study habits.

Each character is built around one study habit that researchers have looked at closely: cramming, rereading, test anxiety, distraction, perfectionism, and learning by explaining. Every claim links to a peer-reviewed study or review, listed below, so you can check it yourself.

Eight questions can't measure your personality, so your result is a starting point, not a label. If you're between two characters, try the techniques from both. And this isn't medical advice: if anxiety, focus or sleep is affecting your daily life, talk to your campus counselling service or a doctor.

references

Adesope, O. O., Trevisan, D. A., & Sundararajan, N. (2017). Rethinking the use of tests: A meta-analysis of practice testing. Review of Educational Research, 87, 659-701. doi.org/10.3102/0034654316689306
Agarwal, P. K., D'Antonio, L., Roediger, H. L., McDermott, K. B., & McDaniel, M. A. (2014). Classroom-based programs of retrieval practice reduce middle school and high school students' test anxiety. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3, 131-139. doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.07.002
Bisra, K., Liu, Q., Nesbit, J. C., Salimi, F., & Winne, P. H. (2018). Inducing self-explanation: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 703-725. doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9434-x
Biwer, F., Wiradhany, W., oude Egbrink, M. G. A., & de Bruin, A. B. H. (2023). Understanding effort regulation: Comparing 'Pomodoro' breaks and self-regulated breaks. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(S2), 353-367. doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12593
Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417-444. doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823
Brady, S. T., Hard, B. M., & Gross, J. J. (2018). Reappraising test anxiety increases academic performance of first-year college students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110, 395-406. doi.org/10.1037/edu0000219
Brunmair, M., & Richter, T. (2019). Similarity matters: A meta-analysis of interleaved learning and its moderators. Psychological Bulletin, 145, 1029-1052. doi.org/10.1037/bul0000209
Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 354-380. doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2009). Mainly openness: The relationship between the Big Five personality traits and learning approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 524-529. doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.06.004
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Ahmetoglu, G., & Furnham, A. (2008). Little more than personality: Dispositional determinants of test anxiety (the Big Five, core self-evaluations, and self-assessed intelligence). Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 258-263. doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.09.002
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14, 4-58. doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2013). The relative benefits of learning by teaching and teaching expectancy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 281-288. doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.06.001
Glass, A. L., & Kang, M. (2019). Dividing attention in the classroom reduces exam performance. Educational Psychology, 39, 395-408. doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1489046
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69-119. doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1
Harkin, B., Webb, T. L., Chang, B. P. I., Prestwich, A., Conner, M., Kellar, I., Benn, Y., & Sheeran, P. (2016). Does monitoring goal progress promote goal attainment? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 198-229. doi.org/10.1037/bul0000025
Hartwig, M. K., & Dunlosky, J. (2012). Study strategies of college students: Are self-testing and scheduling related to achievement? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 126-134. doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0181-y
Jamieson, J. P., Peters, B. J., Greenwood, E. J., & Altose, A. J. (2016). Reappraising stress arousal improves performance and reduces evaluation anxiety in classroom exam situations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 579-587. doi.org/10.1177/1948550616644656
Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331, 772-775. doi.org/10.1126/science.1199327
Karpicke, J. D., Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2009). Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practise retrieval when they study on their own? Memory, 17, 471-479. doi.org/10.1080/09658210802647009
Koh, A. W. L., Lee, S. C., & Lim, S. W. H. (2018). The learning benefits of teaching: A retrieval practice hypothesis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32, 401-410. doi.org/10.1002/acp.3410
Kornell, N. (2009). Optimising learning using flashcards: Spacing is more effective than cramming. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 1297-1317. doi.org/10.1002/acp.1537
Okano, K., Kaczmarzyk, J. R., Dave, N., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Grossman, J. C. (2019). Sleep quality, duration, and consistency are associated with better academic performance in college students. npj Science of Learning, 4, 16. doi.org/10.1038/s41539-019-0055-z
Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9, 105-119. doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x
Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 322-338. doi.org/10.1037/a0014996
Ramirez, G., & Beilock, S. L. (2011). Writing about testing worries boosts exam performance in the classroom. Science, 331, 211-213. doi.org/10.1126/science.1199427
Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2011). Optimizing schedules of retrieval practice for durable and efficient learning: How much is enough? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 283-302. doi.org/10.1037/a0023956
Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 353-387. doi.org/10.1037/a0026838
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249-255. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
Rohrer, D., & Taylor, K. (2007). The shuffling of mathematics problems improves learning. Instructional Science, 35, 481-498. doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9015-8
Rowland, C. A. (2014). The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1432-1463. doi.org/10.1037/a0037559
Sana, F., Weston, T., & Cepeda, N. J. (2013). Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers & Education, 62, 24-31. doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.003
Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Strayer, D. L., Medeiros-Ward, N., & Watson, J. M. (2013). Who multi-tasks and why? Multi-tasking ability, perceived multi-tasking ability, impulsivity, and sensation seeking. PLoS ONE, 8, e54402. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054402
Sirois, F. M., Molnar, D. S., & Hirsch, J. K. (2017). A meta-analytic and conceptual update on the associations between procrastination and multidimensional perfectionism. European Journal of Personality, 31, 137-159. doi.org/10.1002/per.2098
Smith, A. M., Floerke, V. A., & Thomas, A. K. (2016). Retrieval practice protects memory against acute stress. Science, 354, 1046-1048. doi.org/10.1126/science.aah5067
Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 65-94. doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65
von der Embse, N., Jester, D., Roy, D., & Post, J. (2018). Test anxiety effects, predictors, and correlates: A 30-year meta-analytic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 227, 483-493. doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.048
Wohl, M. J. A., Pychyl, T. A., & Bennett, S. H. (2010). I forgive myself, now I can study: How self-forgiveness for procrastinating can reduce future procrastination. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 803-808. doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.029

want a plan built around your character?

Bring your result to a free 20-minute diagnostic. We'll look at your courses and turn your three techniques into a weekly plan you can actually stick to.

book a free diagnostic find your course

what's your study character?

ready?

the sprinter

the habit

your superpower

the personality link

what the research says

try these three.

spread the same hours out

recall it, then relearn it

make if-then plans

the scribe

the habit

your superpower

the personality link

what the research says

try these three.

close the notes and blurt

turn notes into questions

check yourself a day later

the overthinker

the habit

your superpower

the personality link

what the research says

try these three.

practise like it's the real thing

write the worry down

reframe the butterflies

the daydreamer

the habit

your superpower

the personality link

what the research says

try these three.

phone in another room

study in blocks with set breaks

one target per block, on paper

the perfectionist

the habit

your superpower

the personality link

what the research says

try these three.

shrink the first step

mix topics, mistakes included

forgive the slip

the explainer

the habit

your superpower

the personality link

what the research says

try these three.

ask why at every step

teach it without notes

finish with mixed questions

two moves for every character

test yourself

space it out

meet all six

is this a personality test?

references

want a plan built around your character?